The next need within the Church was for some people to identify
with the poor. Some of its members had to be identified with the poor, for the spiritual
well-being of the whole Church. The notion that came into my head was the use
of storefronts. You cannot be paternalistic toward the poor, that is, live
somewhere else and just drop in once in a while and do some kind of social work.
You have to become poor.
Identification with the poor is identification with
Jesus Christ. True, he did say that “the poor you will always have with you.”
But he also said, “I was in prison, I was hungry, etc.” We cannot forget this
judgment that awaits us. I pondered very seriously that judgment.
Again, this kind of thinking was radical and unique. We were
pioneers. Women just didn’t live in storefronts with hoboes! Certainly not!
However, it worked. It worked for the hoboes, and it worked for the many, many
people who came to join us. I understood that begging and being one with the
poor was (and always will be) a crying need of the Church.
Poverty, identification with the poor. Then, because I was
lecturing and constantly being questioned by everyone, I recognized the need to
live by the Gospel. I possessed a New Testament which I carried with me at all times.
The only answers I gave people were from the Gospel, from the scriptures.
Catherine de Hueck Doherty, Fragments
of My Life
Reflection – And so we continue with
Catherine’s reflections. I was talking with someone recently who was telling me
about a family he is good friends with. They consciously live a simple life,
embracing in an appropriate way poverty and austerity in their family life.
This person mentioned that this family has been criticized by others in the
community because they are giving a bad witness to the Gospel.
I
had to ask him to repeat this, as I couldn’t quite fathom what he had just
said. It seems that some people believe that the Gospel looks more attractive
if people who are publicly identified as Christians live wealthy, shiny lives
of privilege and comfort. Since I have been an ardent follower of Catherine
Doherty since I was 19 years old, I can’t quite figure that one out, but I
guess it’s true.
It
must have some connection with the prosperity Gospel that is all too prevalent
in North American Christianity. The idea that God rewards his faithful
followers with big cars, big houses, big careers and (depending on one’s zip
code) big hair seems to have a certain endurance and persuading force.
But…
Jesus Christ was rich, but became poor for our sake, to make us rich out of his
poverty. But the richness there is richness in grace, richness in love,
richness in joy and in peace. A wealth of faith, not temporal goods.
This
choice to live a poor life with the poor (and of course this will look somewhat
different according to your personal vocation – a father of a large family
cannot live like a Franciscan friar) is a deep thing. Riches all too
easily—almost always—insulate us from life, or at least we try to have them do
that. But Jesus didn’t insulate himself from us, and does not insulate himself
from us.
Riches
are a means of control of our world. But if we really love, we give up control
and surrender our hearts to our beloved. If we love as Jesus loves, which is
the whole summation of Christian ethics, we surrender our hearts to the world
Jesus died for.
This
poverty business is a deep matter, deeply at the heart of the Gospel and our
Christian religion. This is why Catherine had such a conviction of it at such
an early point in her apostolic life, and why it pursued her and wouldn’t let
her go throughout her life.
She
was never comfortable with comfort; never sure that she was poor enough, that
MH was poor enough, that we really had identified with Christ to that extent.
And she was no doubt right – it is a profound business.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.