Do not
think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to
abolish them but to fulfill them. For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth
disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any
means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished. Therefore anyone
who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others
accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever
practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of
heaven. For I tell you that unless your righteousness surpasses that of the
Pharisees and the teachers of the law, you will certainly not enter the kingdom
of heaven.
Matthew 5: 17-20
Reflection – I’m going through the Sermon on the
Mount, bit by bit, as a Year of Faith project. The light of faith illuminates
the whole of human life, and so my focus in this series is on the ability of
these core teachings of Jesus to shed light on how we are to live—the true
wisdom of God, and not of the world.
I have to
admit, though, my first thought when I conceived of doing this series was, but
what will I say about Matt 5: 17-20? Because, if we’re honest, I think we can
all admit that there are at least one or two Gospel passages that utterly elude
our attempts to understand them, right? Probably, if we were wiser, we would
realize that we truly understand very little indeed of the Gospels which are so
above and beyond us.
But this is
one of ‘my’ passages, one which I have never quite been able to penetrate.
Because of course we know that the Christian church has never practiced the
whole of the Jewish law, and in fact it was determined by the apostles and
promulgated at length in the writings of St. Paul—all of which is
Spirit-authored canon, just as much as Matthew’s Gospel—that we are not to do
so.
And yet a
plain reading of the text of Matthew 5 yields that we are supposed to practice
and teach the law of Moses. I say this, not to sow doubt or confusion in
anyone’s mind, but to share with you honestly that I have never quite succeeded
in resolving this passage’s meaning in my own mind. I have no doubt whatsoever
that the problem lies between my ears and the immoveable mass of concrete found
there, and not in the sacred text!
Meanwhile,
what light does it shed upon my life and yours? Well, certainly we see from
this passage that a lawless Christianity is not from the Lord. Whatever Jesus
means by these words, He does not mean that He came so that we could all do
just as we please and not before with any silly rules and commandments any
more.
And this is of
course a bright light shining upon post-modern man. Anomy—lawlessness—is
prevalent in our world, and likely to be even more so in years ahead. I won’t
inventory the various social pathologies that make this so. And in some Christian
circles there has been an anomic sense, an idea that freedom means doing what
you wish and that God’s love is permissive and laissez-faire.
Matt 5: 17-20,
besides doing a good job of showing Fr. Denis Lemieux that he’s not especially smart,
makes it impossible for us to sustain this view of Christian freedom. And
perhaps the fact that the Christian Bible retains the whole Law of Moses as
canonical writ has this meaning. Whatever function the Law has in Judaism
(which I have studied, actually, and is very beautiful and rich), in
Christianity perhaps the Law of Moses teaches us that God does indeed
providentially order every dimension, every bit of life in His loving wisdom,
and that the response of loving freedom is not to do as we will, but to do as
God wills in every slightest detail of our life. It has never been the norm of
Christianity to find the specifics of this will and this ordering of life in
the precepts of the Law of Moses, but rather in the Law of Christ, which is the
law of love guided by the gifts of the Spirit.
One of our protestant brothers has told me that if we place ourselves under the(old) law( by choosing to live it)then we become subject to the law and will be judged by it as opposed to being judged by accepting the resurrection. This has always seemed odd to me, as clearly the 10 commandments were not dismissed, but I also can't seem to grasp this passage. Any good reading you could recommend?
ReplyDeleteI agree with Theresa - my hope was always founded in the first and last lines: "...to fulfill them" and "unless your righteousness surpasses ...", that only Jesus' righteousness could hope to fulfill the law, and without Him we have no hope.
ReplyDelete"not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished."
ReplyDeleteDo Lk 22:15-16 ("I have greatly desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer; for I say to you that I will eat of it no more, until it has been fulfilled in the kingdom of God.") and Jn 19:30 ("when Jesus had taken the wine, he said, 'It is consummated!'") have anything to do with this question?