Two rules are generally regarded nowadays as fundamental
for interreligious dialogue:
1. Dialogue does not aim at conversion, but at
understanding. In this respect it differs from evangelization, from mission;
2. Accordingly, both parties to the dialogue remain
consciously within their identity, which the dialogue does not place in
question either for themselves or for the other.
These rules are correct, but in the way they are
formulated here I still find them too superficial. True, dialogue does not aim at
conversion, but at better mutual understanding – that is correct. But all the
same, the search for knowledge and understanding always has to involve drawing
closer to the truth. Both sides in this piece-by-piece approach to truth are
therefore on the path that leads forward and towards greater commonality,
brought about by the oneness of the truth.
As far as preserving identity is concerned, it would be
too little for the Christian, so to speak, to assert his identity in a such a
way that he effectively blocks the path to truth. Then his Christianity would
appear as something arbitrary, merely propositional. He would seem not to
reckon with the possibility that religion has to do with truth.
On the contrary, I would say that the Christian can
afford to be supremely confident, yes, fundamentally certain that he can
venture freely into the open sea of the truth, without having to fear for his
Christian identity. To be sure, we do not possess the truth, the truth
possesses us: Christ, who is the truth, has taken us by the hand, and we know
that his hand is holding us securely on the path of our quest for knowledge.
Being inwardly held by the hand of Christ makes us free and keeps us safe: free
– because if we are held by him, we can enter openly and fearlessly into any
dialogue; safe – because he does not let go of us, unless we cut ourselves off
from him. At one with him, we stand in the light of truth.
Address
to Roman Curia, December 21,
2012
Reflection – ‘We do not
possess the truth; the truth possesses us.’ The Pope hear sails into some of
the truly tricky elements of inter-religious dialogue. We are not relativists.
We do not believe that Catholicism is merely one religious path among many, all
of equal value. We do believe it is true.
And yet this call to
inter-religious dialogue, so vital in the world today wracked by war, violence,
suspicion and hate, must be done with great respect for the beliefs of others,
and the strong elements of beauty, truth, goodness present in every religion
and every human heart.
It is this whole business of being
possessed by the truth that is our surety in this work. In other words, ‘the
truth’ is not in its essence some list of propositions or an ideology or
debating points or a syllogism. It is a Person, and this is Jesus Christ who
loves us and holds us in his care.
Because the truth that possesses us
is that strong, that vital, that real—not some fragile certainty that we barely
manage to hold onto, but a living communion of love—we don’t have to be afraid
of other world views. We can listen with love to the Hindu, the Buddhist, the
Muslim, the Jew. The love of Christ extends towards them, too, and if we are
living in that love the very work of dialogue becomes deeply missionary, deeply
evangelical, as Christ’s love enters the dialogue through our own interior
dialogue with Him in the midst of it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.