“I cannot see what
harm would come of letting us know a little—as much at least as might serve to
assure us that there was more of something on the other side.”
“Just this; that, their fears allayed,
their hopes encouraged from any lower quarter, men would (as usual) turn away
from the Fountain, to the cistern of life…
“That there are thousands who would
forget God if they could but be assured of such a tolerable state of things
beyond the grave as even this wherein we now live, is plainly to be anticipated
from the fact that the doubts of so many in respect of religion concentrate
themselves nowadays upon the question whether there is any life beyond the
grave; a question which… does not immediately belong to religion at all.
“Satisfy such people, if you can, that
they shall live, and what have they gained? A little comfort perhaps—but a
comfort not from the highest source, and possibly gained too soon for their
well-being. Does it bring them any nearer to God than they were before? Is He
filling one cranny more of their hearts in consequence?”
George MacDonald, Thomas Wingfold,
Curate
Reflection
–
Our journey this week with great Protestant writers takes us from Bonhoeffer
yesterday in Nazi Germany to 19th century Scotland and the great
Presbyterian minister and author George MacDonald (Updated to correct: by the end of his life, he had become Church of England). Known today primarily for
his children’s stories (The Princess and the Goblin, etc.), and for his
influence on C.S. Lewis, he was a prolific novelist and writer of Christian
theology.
This excerpt, plucked more or less at
random from an anthology of his writings edited by Lewis, raises very profound
questions within the context of the silence of God and the demands of faith as
opposed to absolute knowledge.
The fact is, all the testimony of
Scripture set aside, along with all the various visions vouchsafed to mystics
over the centuries, the simple truth is neither you nor I nor anyone really
knows what happens to us the minute after we die. We can believe all we
like about it, and we can (and have) crafted rather strong philosophical
arguments in favor of the existence of something immaterial in the human person
that can then credibly be held to survive the death of the material body.
But we don’t know, and even if our
philosophical understanding is strong enough that we assert actual knowledge of
the immortal soul (which I think we can), we really don’t know what
happens afterwards, what immortality would look like, and any specifics of the
afterlife. Even the Scriptures are very scarce on details, of course.
Well, MacDonald suggests to us here
that it would actually be pretty bad for us, spiritually and morally, if we did
have a positive and definite knowledge of these matters that was vouchsafed to
humanity in general. And in this, he is making a very perceptive statement about
the nature of God, of faith, of humanity, that takes us beyond the specific
question of life after death into much broader fields.
C.S. Lewis broached this question in
one of his last works, the magnificent Til We Have Faces, which I always
rank among my all time favorite books. ‘Why are holy places dark places?’ is
his formulation of it. Why is God hidden from man? Why the mystery, why the
lack of positive, definite knowledge? Why doesn’t God just show Himself plainly
and speak plainly and make His existence and will so utterly clear and lucid to
us that everyone can see what it is and act accordingly? What’s with all the
hide and seek? Is God playing games with us? Because… with all due respect,
it’s not a very fun game, Lord!
I will leave you to discover C.S.
Lewis’ answer to that question in that book, if you haven’t already (it is, in
my view, his greatest work, and well worth tracking down). But MacDonald
suggests here, in the context of life after death, that it simply would not be
good for us to know too much, to have too much certainty at this point of our
spiritual journey.
Too much knowledge at too soon a stage
is not necessarily a good thing. We have all seen (and perhaps, alas, know from
first hand) that a child who is exposed to too much knowledge about the world
and its ways at too young an age does not grow well. Jaundiced cynicism, that
sad parody of wisdom, is the result. Children should be given knowledge of the
world and all its good and evil gradually and according to their capacity to absorb
it.
Well, we are all, spiritually,
children, whether we like to admit it or not. And it is the wisdom of our
Father in heaven that it simply would not be good for us to know too
much about the deep mysteries of life and death right now. In our perverse
wills and fallen intellects, too much knowledge would coarsen us or make us
complacent or indifferent or blasé.
‘Familiarity breeds contempt’. God
never allows us to become familiar with Him, and this is a very good thing for
us. ‘Stay thirsty, my friends,’ says the Most Interesting Man in the World
(ahem), and this is good wisdom found, oddly, in the genre of a beer advertisement.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.