The [modern] journalist begins with a
worship of success and violence, and ends in sheer timidity and mediocrity. But
he is not alone in this, nor does he come by this fate merely because he
happens personally to be stupid. Every man, however brave, who begins by
worshipping violence, must end in mere timidity.
Every man, however wise, who begins by
worshipping success, must end in mere mediocrity. This strange and paradoxical
fate is involved, not in the individual, but in the philosophy, in the point of
view. It is not the folly of the man which brings about this necessary fall; it
is his wisdom.
The worship of success is the only one
out of all possible worships of which this is true, that its followers are
foredoomed to becomes slaves and cowards. A man may be a hero for the sake of
Mrs. Gallup’s ciphers or for the sake of human sacrifice, but not the sake of
success.
For obvious a man can choose to fail
because he loves Mrs. Gallup or human sacrifice; but he cannot choose to fail
because he loves success. When the test of triumph is man’s test of everything,
they never endure long enough to triumph at all. As long as matters are really
hopeful, hope is a mere flattery or platitude; it is only when everything is
hopeless that hope begins to be a strength at all. Like all the Christian
virtues, it is as unreasonable as it is indispensable.
It was through this fatal paradox in
the nature of things that all these modern adventurers come at last to a sort
of tedium and acquiescence. They desired strength; and to them to desire
strength was to admire strength; to admire strength was simply to admire the status
quo. They thought that he who wished to be strong ought to respect the
strong. They did not realize the obvious verity that he who wishes to be strong
must despise the strong.
They sought to be everything, to have
the whole force of the cosmos behind them, to have an energy that would drive
the stars. But they did not realize the two great facts---first, that in the
attempt to be everything the first and most difficult step is to be something;
second, that the moment a man is something, he is essentially defying
everything…
When modern sociologists talk of the
necessity of accommodating oneself to the trend of the time, they forget that
the trend of the time at its best consists entirely of people who will not
accommodate themselves to anything. At its worst it consists of many millions
of frightened creatures all accommodating themselves to a trend that is not
there. And that is more and more the situation of modern England.
GK Chesterton, Heretics
Reflection – Not
just modern England, either, big guy! The tendency which GKC observes here, the
use of phrases like ‘being modern and up to date’, ‘getting with the program’
and such and so has only become more acute in the century since he wrote this.
The chapter this is taken from is called
“The Mildness of the Yellow Press”, how what is supposed to be hard-hitting and
shocking journalism is fundamentally a cynical toadying to the powers of the
moment in service of the agenda of the moment. Uh, yeah – that hasn’t exactly
gotten any better lately either. I will spare you what I actually think of our
modern media, as I don’t think I could do so whilst still using language
befitting a reverend member of the clergy.
But since most of us are not, in fact,
journalists, let’s think about this larger point GKC is making: the worship of
success as a certain path to mediocrity and failure, the worship of strength as
a certain path to weakness and timidity and cowardice.
I am reminded of a very funny bit from a
Lily Tomlin routine where her character says “I always wanted to be someone,
but I realize now I should have been more specific.” The truth of the matter
is, we have to be more specific. We have to decide, not to be successful or
strong or catch the wave (unless we are, in fact, surfing). Rather, we have to
choose to be something real, do something that matters, some good thing outside
ourselves that we care enough about to pour our whole heart and soul into it,
whether we succeed or fail.
I remember full well making my final
promises in Madonna House in 1998, acutely and painfully mindful of my weakness
and inability to live this vocation well at all, yet deciding simply that I
would rather fail at MH than succeed somewhere else that I didn’t care about. I
would rather give my all in some ‘hopeless’ endeavor that meant the world to me
than be all rational and canny and calculating in something that I didn’t
actually care two cents for.
And it’s the same dynamic at play with
all the trends and issues and preference cascades of the day. Whatever you
think of, say, same-sex marriage, the last thing in the world you should think
is ‘Well, everyone is getting on board with this, so I guess I should, too.’
Cowardice, that is—rank, mediocre, craven, cowardice. Be a Man, or a Woman, and
think your own thoughts, and come to your own conclusions—don’t be bullied or
rushed by the mendacious ninnies in the media-entertainment business who don’t
know anything about anything and whose only concern is to accommodate
themselves to a trend that isn’t there and to make everyone as mediocre and
compliant as they themselves are so they can sell you whatever product they’re
shilling (oops, there I go telling you what I think… better stop for today!).
Ah, there it is 'same sex marriage' mentioned and a temptation to fall into line be with the flow rather than thinking for one's self and standing up for what is right. It appears most Catholic cannot define marriage from a faith prospective so they enter the discussion with one arm tied behind their back. This has led to "stinking Catholic thinking" on this issue at a growing disservice to our faith and will soon lead to an assault on our teaching and we shall see about strength and bravery or acquiescence. Is it the media, really, or a lack of understanding to begin with which undermines right choices and the ability to recognize wrong headed reporting for what it is. Jesus is the light of the world. Don't drive our the darkness just turn on the light.
ReplyDeleteYes, indeed. We do need to try to have a conversation, not so much about 'same-sex marriage' as about marriage, period, but that is no easy thing to do in our current climate. But try we must.
DeleteI agree that it's easy to blame the media for it - really, they are just the symptom, not the disease. What the disease is... well, not so sure, but Jesus the light is the cure, that I know!
Peace to you.
In August I was invited to present a program in an 800 family parish about the Christian definition of marriage and how people of various orientations, currently secular activists are using same sex-marriage to redefine the definition of Christian marriage in institutions and judicial venues. I did not address homosexuality as such though it came up ("we want respect and equality in marriage"). There were three priests in attendance one was my back up on Church teaching. It went well, the best part was the comments of married individuals and what marriage meant to them. Powerful. I am meeting with the pastor of my home parish this week about a similar program in this parish. Turning on the light I hope. Enjoying your writings. Thanks.
ReplyDelete